Creating Powerful Communications #CIPD11

November 14, 2011

Creating powerful communication to mobilise your workforce

Creating Powerful Communication -exercise at #cipd11At the CIPD annual conference last week in Manchester, one of the sessions I attended was by Steve Head, called “Creating powerful communication to mobilise your workforce”.

Every year at this and other conferences like it, there is a mix of good, bad and ugly speakers and sessions, and then amongst the “good” hides THE session. This is “THE” session which delivers more than people expect at a professional conference, and this IMHO was the session from CIPD11.

The laughter was honest and regular throught the session.

Steve is a charismatic and entertaining presenter, without the pretentiousness of many at this level. I am sure that many attended the session expecting something about corporate communications. Indeed the session was described as:

Speaker – Steve Head, Coach and Author of A Near Life Experience: making the most of who you are.

This session will look at:

• how delivering strategies, leading change and engaging with the business all hinges on your ability to communicate more effectively

• the key principles of a successful HR communication strategy – how you can develop and implement improvements

• the most appropriate communication style and how it will help you engage with your workforce

Did the session deliver this..?

yes.. but not from an organizational perspective , but from a human perspective.

This session started with what some people would have described a “high risk strategy” with Steve first getting people to undertake a simple activity showing how change really feels and then stepped up his game by essentially tying people together in pairs with string. The activity was fast paces, and while there must have been 200+ people in the room, the activity and key learning points were well facilitated. I won’t describe the activity to avoid spoiling the effect for potential delegates. The key point that head was illustrating was that communication is in essence a mindset. “if you think you can you can.. and if you think your cannot – you are right”

Definition of Communication

Head gave us a simple working definition of “communication” – The sending, receiving and understanding of a message.

It’s all about Feedback

Not only did Head show that it was about mindset, but that we all have a natural predisposition to seeing data and information in a particular way. Look at the graphic below and consider what you will say:

The answer (scroll down when you have made your decision)

 ↓

 ↓

 ↓

 ↓

 ↓
So what was your the first reaction?

 ↓

 ↓

 ↓

  ↓

Was your answer something like….”the last one is wrong… the answer is 16″ ?

 

It is interesting that the vast majority of people will say “but the last one is wrong”, when in fact a more productive approach may be – great you have 3 right, well done and it would be Even Better If (EBI) you have a look at number 4 again…

You get what you focus on

It’s all about focus. As Hersey & Blanchard say in the “One Minute Manager” – catch people doing things right – it’s easy to catch them doing something wrong!

It is curious that we are often reminded of mistakes time and time again, and yet successes are easily forgotten. Head pointed out that we never look at or think about attending seminars on “Finding the bad stuff” for we are good at that already! We recognise that we have weaknesses and yet while we seek “out of the box” solutions, we rarely seek to improve ourselves by looking in the mirror and doing to others what we would want ourselves.

Communications starts inside, with both our motivations and beliefs.

Head pointed out that while many of us seeking to improve talent management or employee engagement through motivation; he had the belief that people already had the motivation. What many of our people lack is the confidence. The confidence to “have a go”, the confidence to risk making mistakes without that mistake being put around their neck for the rest of their time with the organization like some kind of campaign medal for failure.

I have seen this in my voluntary work. Often the challenge with developing people for responding to emergency situations is not the skills themselves, sure they can be complex, but they are in essence simple. The real challenge is developing the self belief or confidence that they can “do it”, and that they will make a difference.

Summary

Much of what Head said could be seen as “stating the bl**dy obvious”, and yet if it were that obvious managers would not spend much of their time looking for and catching people doing the wrong things, they would spend more of their time catching people doing the right things.

The emphasis on the human factors, rather than the process factors was a pleasant surprise. The passion, energy and focus that Steve head demonstrated for both his subject and the audience was on the day, second to none. If people left this session without some action, no matter how small, then they were not in the room.

My only fear is that some will get “hung up” on his “show” techniques rather than the underlying message.


Employee Engagement & Talent Management #cipd11

November 11, 2011

Engagement – heads they win, tails you lose

CIPD annual conference Manchester 2011Who are “THEY”?

Why your competitors of course.

This article contains some of my thoughts and reflections from Day 2 of the annual CIPD conference in Manchester UK.

The recurring theme and thought at this years CIPD annual conference for HR professionals has been engagement. Some speakers have spoken about the value engagement provides to the level of customer engagement and retention, others about productivity, but the overriding factor has been that engaged staff reduce costs, reduce absence, increase sales and deliver customer fans.

So why do HR and business leaders not trust our staff to represent our brands to existing and potential customers and long term customer fans?

This manifests its self in a number of ways:

1) The way we empower and enable our staff to solve customer questions at one point

2) The way we show our distrust by not allowing staff to use social media.

While waiting for a potential client I overheard a member of staff of a well known professional body say to a delegate “sorry I’m not important enough to have a business card. Now think about how valued that person would feel and how they would represent the brand if they had £10 worth of business cards. It’s also a great way to show staff you trust them.

A few weeks ago I was involved in an accreditation meeting and the accreditation representative said the reason they were not issued business cards was for tax reasons…. Utter bull!

This simple act of ensuring that EVERYONE in your business has individual business cards sends many messages – to managers, staff and customers. Give personal cards even if the employee is unlikely to be customer facing. O2 go one further and have a text number staff can call to help give advice if they are approached by a customer, where ever they are in the world. It’s the little things.

Much like the prohibition in the US tried to stop the consumption of alcohol, when we (try to) stop people from using social media, all we do in fact is drive it underground. On the surface all is quiet, but duck under and all is alive frantic and well. Worse, if people cannot be proud of the organisation for which they work they cannot be advocates or help to grow the fan base.

It’s all about the small things. We need to show that we trust our people and that (one the whole) they will do the right things. Sure they will make mistakes, but they will learn from them if we provide positive and supportive feedback.

Most of our people are honest at heart and their only intension is to support our customers and the business.. Our role as managers is to trust, support and give them the tools to excel, not to be mediocre.

If your organisation has 1000 employees then typically 5-8 people will be involved in sales & marketing. Imagine the power and growth potential if every one of those 1000 were taking a proactive marketing or sales role? Even if only 20% did, that’s double your sales & marketing team for no cost!

Engagement needs to be more than initiative; it’s an attitude from managers, which create an attitude and set of behaviours in staff. There is no magic process or set of tools, sure regular surveys can help measure, but that is only the very beginning of the journey and not the end by anyone’s stretch of their imagination


Supporting Change in Organisations

March 22, 2011

How do we support change in organizations?

Human Resources supporting change imageHow do HR support change and change management in organisations? This is a HUGE subject. As this question is being asked of HR people more and more in the current climate, this is the first of a series of articles looking at not just change management, but the supporting role that HR, OD and training professionals can make.

Lets start out by understanding what the phrase “Support organisations going through change”. Now by this I am assuming that we are not driving the change – that is happening elsewhere, nor are we managing it, our role is to provide support to the organisation as the change process is unravelled.

Supporting change could include the:

  • Project management of change
  • People psychology aspects of change
  • Communications in change
  • The importance of clarity in change
  • HR issues attached to change
    • Redeployment
    • Attitudes
    • Policy changes
    • Individual development needs
    • Development – Skills change
    • Behaviours/ attitudes
    • Staffing levels required (up or down)
    • Relocation
    • Mergers

And much of this will depend on the context and nature of the proposed change compared to the status quo:

  • Organic change
  • Transformational change
  • Developmental change
  • Transitional change

and the purpose of change:

  • Structural change
  • Cost cutting
  • Process change
  • Cultural change

How can we support change & change management in organizations?

So what can we as HR do to support change…. lots – but only what the project lead needs us to do.

If we go off all maverick, solving problems that actually do not exist yet, we can add to the pain and difficulty of the change for the organisation. We need to be in a position to deliver the objectives of the change programme at the time the change programme requires them. this means us having a clear relationship with both the change leader and the key stakeholder.

For me one of the most important things we can do is once we know the goals and strategy of the change, we need to carry out a diagnostic process to find out “where we are”. now depending on the nature and scope of change, this could result in different actions even though we are starting in the same place. appropriate diagnosis in the context of the goals and culture are critical for cost effective and timely success.

 

What are our goals in supporting organisations in change?

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) require practitioners in this area to be capable of:

  • Understanding why organisations need to change and how change affects organisations
  • Understanding  the key factors involved in the change process and different approaches to managing change
  • Understanding the impact of change on employees and the role of human resources (HR)

So this is a good a place to start as any other. Success criteria in supporting change in organizations requires practitioners to be able to:

1.1 Explain why organisations need to change with reference to internal and external factors

1.2 Explain how change can impact an organisation’s business

2 Understand the key factors involved in the change process and different approaches to managing change

2.1 Explain the main factors involved in the change process

2.2 Compare and contrast different approaches to managing change

3 Understand the impact of change on employees and the role of human resources (HR)

3.1 Compare and contrast the different behavioural responses people may demonstrate when an organisation is experiencing change

3.2 Explain the role of HR in supporting individuals during organisational change

 

In this introductory article we will start with the top level questions:

Why do organisations need to change?

Because their customers, the technology and environment are changing – and lets be honest the market for arga black or coal buckets is much less than it was 100 years ago – it is all about business survival at some stage. This is one of the reasons why conducting a PESTLE analysis is critical. And for HR, HRD & OD professionals understanding the results from a PESTLE analysis and its impact on the people, skills and attitudes elements are critical for both business sustainability and success.

What key factors are involved in the change process?

Until we know the nature and scope of the change being considered this is a difficult one. Consider using the PRIMO-F framework to identify some areas and potential factors to consider. In addition think about, people, their sense of security, any feelings or sense of loss, relationships with peers, productivity etc.

What are the different approaches to managing and supporting change?

There are many approaches, one of the most common series is based on project management principles. While this is OK in theory, it carries the risk of being too process based and not people orientated. Often if the project is managed rather then led (i.e. management rather than leadership) it can fail to spot the unseen issues which can have a significant impact on people engagement and productivity for some considerable time into the future.

What is the impact of change on employees and the role of human resources (HR)

This may be as little as re-skills some of the workforce, right through to relocation, redundancy, job change, merger and a raft of other significant HR based impacts. Relationships between the workforce and management may breakdown due to loss of trust. each change program will have widely different impacts, and each ones cannot be managed against any template or check-list. we need to be “on the ground” being proactive and aligning any subtle changes back to the project leader and designing appropriate interventions to minimise any impacts.

How does change impact on an organisations business? -

How long is a piece of string – it depends if the change is wanted in the org, by who and how this is communicated and managed. many changes are not noticed – generally only the badly managed ones are remembered!

What sort of behaviours do people demonstrate when going through change? -

Again – I could list all of the human emotions here as they may all be applicable depending on the change, the impact on the individuals, what they thought of the “old way” – not all change is negative! see our Change management models page for some of the behaviours we may expect in a change situation.

Change is not all bad. Often we approach change and change management as dangerous – disliked. this is not true, and in many situations the employees are the first to cry – thank you.. at last – we have been saying this for a long time but no one was listening! Often change is welcomed – it is how it is communicated cam make all the difference.

HR, HRD and other allied functions have a key role in supporting the people, the business and the change management processes.

 

 

 

 


Culture to Ride the Wave of Innovation #cipd10

November 11, 2010

Day 2 at #cipd10 – Riding the waves of innovation

Looking at culture, diversity and innovation was Fons Trompenaars. It would be easy to dismiss Trompenaars as being out dated and out of context, but from what I recall of seeing Trompenaars some 12+ years ago his message has changed and kept fresh.

Trompenaars started out by saying that the “essence of innovation is to combine existing stuff in exciting ways”. He told stories of when his consulting firm would be asked to go in and work with firms that had just “come out the other side” of a major project with one of the big consulting firms. He said that often the client would take them around the firm and show off the IT solutions they have as a result of the work, his stated reply was “… yes but people live here”.

Describing our world as one full of bi-polar attitudes and thoughts. He cited as an example MBTI. Saying that can we only be Thinking or Feeling? Why not both? This statement resonated with many in the room. His view was that in order to innovate it was not about Thinking or Feeling – but Thinking WITH Feeling, or Feeling with Thought.

Trompenaars has strong views on a number of issues for example:

  • Research – is just academics quoting each other and going round in circles – what we need is “search” not “research”

Having “destroyed” MBTI (a familiar tool), he then went on to look at KAI – the Kirton innovation tool. Again criticised as being bipolar but more than that Trompenaars said that in his view Kirton has confused Invention for innovation. As a measure of inventiveness he agreed that the tool added value – but that innovation was more a function of invention AND Adaptiveness (another scale on the instrument). I found this particularly interesting, as I have thought this true since working with the Creatrix Innovation inventory. What Trompenaars described as innovation is clearly identified in the Creatrix the work of Byrd some 40+ years ago.

Individual or team?

The rest of the session was in essence looking at how we could help leaders to move from being bi-polar thinking – to duality – or “both and” approach. For example not the dilemma of individual creativity or team performance. He put the case that not only can we have both – but for future sustainability and growth we need both.

Overall some interesting ideas. How clearly his ideas are communicated in his book only time will tell.

My notes on this session were extensive and I will generate a bigger article in time.


Beyond Survival- delivering ambitious growth #cipd10

November 10, 2010

Beyond Survival – delivering growth through your people #cipd10

New Look Logo This was the last session of day one at this years CIPD annual conference. It was led by Carl McPhail CEO of New Look the large UK retailer.

 After showing us a short (1min) promotional video showing the business time line from conception as a market stall to its current multi million operation. McPhail introduced the business as “always being about change” and that to be successful in a sustainable way “you need to engage with customers as well as employees”.

McPhail talked about the cycle of products, the number of times the average customer visited (on average twice a month) and the need to have new products on the shelf for every visit and a complete stock change every 8 weeks. He highlighted that just 5 partner suppliers provided 50% of all new products and that while many would consider this narrow supply chain as a risk, McPhail considers this to be a strength for both the supplier and themselves.

It was at this point that it really dawned on me – here is a CEO at a HR conference talking business not HR. the language he was using was more about profit, than retention or other HR measures. This was refreshing. It was not that he was ignoring HR – he wasn’t, what he was doing was truly integrating HR & the business.

McPhail went on to talk about the strategy to achieve their aggressive growth ambitions. It included the following:

  • Being the #1 in the retail market space
  • Aggressive targets
  • Sales & profits
  • Cash & returns
  • UK space
  • Product
  • Multi-channel
  • International
  • World class benchmarking
  • Obsessive customer focus
  • Best people

McPhail highlighted the last three:

Benchmarking, this is not within the sector to other retail providers – but best in class – logistics, finance etc

Customer focus, in that they have created social media channels, Facebook, “MyLook” – they own network, so that they can take temperature checks on a daily basis so that they can react to what the customer experience is

Best People – McPhail himself says that he has his strengths and weaknesses, and that he knows his weaknesses and engages with the best people he can find (in and outside the business) to address this. The examples he gave was the introduction of online shopping and social media, as it was his team that recommended the change of channel.

On the people agenda – all leaders (himself included) have been assessed and personal development plans put in place. He said that he relied on his HRD to provide honest information on the people in the business and to act as a trusted adviser. The HR leadership approach aspires to provide:

  • Advice
  • Support
  • Trust
  • Integrity
  • Fun
  • Honesty

Overall this was a refreshingly honest and business led session (rather than many fad based sessions), good to hear the value a CEO puts on HR, when HR works with the leadership to deliver a successful business.


CIPD Annual Conference #cipd10

November 9, 2010

CIPD Annual Conference 2010 – #cipd10

#cipd10 imageThis year as last the annual shin-dig of the Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development CIPD (the UK’s professional body for HR, HRD & OD professionals) is taking place at Manchester.

Some interesting sessions attended so far.

The introduction by Jackie Orme – the CIPD’s CEO set the scene for the event. Pointing out that for an organisation to be a success required a unique blend of both financial health of the business with an appropriate level of social responsibility.

The CIPD being both politically and sectorally independent puts the CIPD in a unique position. Orme highlighted the importance of putting the people agenda back at the centre of HR work, meeting both the business needs and the needs of the people to deliver the business.

Orme announces a package of changes to the CIPD member offer to further develop the support to members and their growth throughout their career, recognising that cost of CIPD services may have been a barrier in the past. New services and price revisions are taking place to address this.

Orme suggested that HR needed to be more insight led rather than policy led for the future success of both our profession and our organisations.

Keynote

Ram Charan

A charismatic professional that started out by asking how many people used powerpoint for such presentations.. then proceeded to spend the entire session “out in the participants” – not using any visual aids and engaging with people eye-to-eye. I suspect that some of the audience may have felt a little intimidated by this.

He had some great messages.

His first was that to be a good athlete they need to train – not just with complex kit, but doing the basics like press-ups. Now the athletes don’t like this but they do it as practice and practicing the basics is fundamental to success. Using the analogy we were challenged as to what are the boring basics we need to practice in HR/ HRD? He suggested that relationships, influencing are amongst those things – and do we practice them often enough?

The future of HR is as the trustee of the people – much like the CFO is the trustee of finance. This means we need to understand the talent we have, where each person adds value and where they do not, and to make sure that key decision makers are aware of the latent talent so that it can be retained, grown and deployed.

The key role HR has were stated as:

1)      to be the trustee of people

2)      recognise the potential in every leader in clear and specific ways (actions not competence)

3)      to find people and find a fit for them and to develop them (note the order – not what is traditional, putting people into roles!

For Hr to do this properly we must not rely on 360 and other measurements – the human brain is better at this, we need to see them in action – in the “day job”. We need to be able to spot leaders with “bandwidth” capacity.

As HR professionals, one thing that we can add strategically to the business is to be able to spot “social trends” occurring both inside and outside our organisations and look for the organisational relevance and inform business leaders. HR is better connected than many other functions to do this.

He stated the obvious and yet it seemed in context – WTHOUT PEOPLE YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS.

This session covered a lot – too much to put here – when I have digested this maybe there will be a longer piece!


How to select people for redundancy – and destroy your business for a long time to come

November 1, 2010

How to select people for redundancy – use 360′s?

Image saying 360 assessmentsor – How to select people for redundancy – and destroy your business for a long time to come

We know that we are in increasingly difficult times for many businesses and organisations. With many having to both “down size” and “right size”. This means identifying the roles that have to go. In the UK it is illegal to make people redundant – it is the jobs that go. 

This month has seen an interesting article published in People Management (the journal for the CIPD the UK’s professional body for HR professionals) entitled How to… use assessment for redundancy

In the piece the author Helen Bradley outlines how assessment can help ensure the right choices are made. However this piece has drawn considerable concerns from other professionals in the assessment & HR/ OD arena. 

One of the reasons the author gives for using assessments is 

Keep it legal
An employer is legally responsible for ensuring its assessment processes are fair to all parties and follow best practice. For example, if you appear to favour older or younger people, you open yourself up to possible claims for discrimination or unfair dismissal under UK employment law”
 

This statement seems to ignore the fact that it is jobs that are lost not people. One commentator – Harvey Bennett replied with a short piece entitled Don’t employ 360s for redundancy selection. If it can be clearly shown that the jobs going are for whatever reason are no longer required and they happen to be staffed predominantly by one demographic, then that is unfortunate. Not illegal. 

What is important is to ensure that all jobs that go are not “mission critical” for the future needs of the business. Where the number of roles in a given area are being reduced, then people should be evaluated by performance to date and abilities for the future. Some assessment criteria is important – but not 360 tools. The tools should be objective in nature not based on the opinions of others who may also be “at risk” or have a grudge against an individual. 

My reply on one of the HR forums was: 

We need to look at this (selecting assessment tools and identifying people to leave an organisation) from a long term OD perspective to understand the issues here – and not just at a tactical response level.

Some years ago I was training manager just after a large “right sizing” operation, where members of staff were actively involved in the decision of who should stay and who would go – sometimes directly, but often indirectly by service type through a series of “brainstorming” sessions looking at service provision – much like an individual contributing to a 360 review of an individual.

The trauma and guilt left in people that survived lasted almost 5 years – this is a nasty and dangerous strategy for survivor survival.  The mental health and wellbeing of “survivors” will determine the make or break of the resulting organisation.

Once people know that a 360 feedback is PART of the process you will change people’s behaviors (forever) about how they provide feedback – some will be overly negative about others as a defense to ensure their score is better than others – others will not like the idea of this and provide overly positive feedback.

Sorry but this (using 360 and associated tools for selection for redundancy) is VERY wrong at so many levels.

On the surface and at an intellectual level it seems like a reasonable course of actions, however when we look at the emotional and psychological aspects of the whole process we realise that it is prone to failure and potentially ensure the death of 360s from that organisation for 5+ years. 

We are HR/ OD professionals need to start to advise managers about the real impact of making decisions like this.

?? Data Protection??If people contribute to this (a 360 process) under the expectations of “development” and the data is then used for “selection/ de-selection”, I suspect that this is then in breach of the data protection act – or at least is highly unethical and unprofessional. 

 

Comments from others on this subject  include: 

“I have found a 360 process, if managed well, to be a good development tool but would not use it in this way!  

“As someone who has just gone through redundancy with many of my colleagues, balanced feedback and honesty on how an organisations sees your future is important to your personal decision making, particularly if individuals are asked to apply for new/other roles but there are ways of doing this without 360. I have often found people hide behind the 360 tool and it therefore has a tendency to become corrupted especially when referenced outside of development scenarios” 

“I firmly believe that 360 should be used as a developmental tool and in my experience can be incredibly powerful when used as part of a coaching or wider OD programme. To use it as a tool for redundancy is wrong and will only encourage negative feelings for those subjected to it in such a manner in the future” 

So if 360 tools are best not used for selecting people when having to lay people off, what is a good approach? 

If the business has been managing people and roles well through a business aligned performance management system, the decision should be easier than if performance management has been poor. 

Many of the “assessment centre” approaches seem to focus on skill and competence. This is all very well but when aligning an organisation for the future, the skills that got the organisation to where it is now will not necessarily be the skills it needs for the future. It has been said by many that skills and competence can be developed more easily that attitude, so if focusing on skills for retention it may lead to poor performance in the future. People with a good work attitude and ethic tend to perform and learn well no matter what the task – they learn the skills required quickly. 

Conclusions 

Bennett in one piece put it so well that I shall repeat his comments here: 

The advice that it give to my customers when supporting them in the introduction of 360 is:   

  • Don’t link 360 to individual reward decisions
  • Don’t link 360 to redundancy selection decisions
  • Don’t link 360 to disciplinary/disciplinary situations
  • Do use the tool for professional and organisational development purposes
  • Do make it clear to the people who will be the subjects of 360 feedback what are ‘the rules of engagement’ – voluntary or mandatory participation, who ‘owns’ the data, who will see the data, for what purpose will individual data be used, for what purpose collective/aggregate data be used (e.g. an organisational training needs analysis), assurances about anonymity and confidentiality, and support through facilitation, coaching, etc.

Putting a system in place to “arse cover” or to enable managers to dodge the decision making process is wrong. Yes it is difficult – very difficult, and one of the reasons managers get management pay is to make tough decisions. Individuals need to take responsibility for the decision for an individual to lose their job – not “pass the buck” by being able to say “well I wanted you to stay but according to the system…..” Its almost as bad and the early approaches to redundancy – “last in first out”. 

Managers it’s time to step up to the plate

Don’t use 360 degree feedback tools in the selection of people to be made redundant!

ASTD, SHRM and CIPD in Merger Talks – Shock news in the world of HR

April 1, 2010

ASTD CIPD SHRM

 

Secret talks are taking place today in Virginia between the ASTD, SHRM and CIPD with regards to a future merger.

The team at RapidBI heard late last night that talks scheduled for later today are taking place hosted by SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management) in Virginia, USA. If this happens, and the three organisations combine forces it will make the worlds largest professional body with in excess of  400, 000 members (after duplicate memberships are deducted).

Not new…
It is understood that talks have been on going since Jackie Orme took over as chief executive of the CIPD in April 2008. Regular travel between these two UK and US organisations have been taking place over the last two years with and agreement getting closer and closer. A Google of the term “ASTD CIPD SHRM merger” gives little away, but drop SHRM from the search and there are clues to this series of talks. It appears that this has been on the table for some time. It is not clear if the SHRM are included in the talks or if they are the mediator for the discussions.

Cheryl Myles CIPD Branch Development Manager said that the plans were originally to announce the merger at the ASTD International Conference and EXPO May 16 – 19, 2010 in Chicago, IL, however due to pressures within the executives within the SHRM (whose conference is due to take place on June 27 – 30, 2010, San Diego Convention Center, Calf) it was agreed that the CIPDs HRD Conference and Exhibition, 21-22 April 2010, Olympia London would be a better place to announce the new venture, and be the starting point for a road show at each of these events sharing the strategy prior to asking members to vote later in the year.

Johanna Ratcliff, Digital Communications Manager, who is responsible for all web and intranet structures in the CIPD said ” there are a lot of new developments which we have been working on for some time which will provide a 21st century service to an ever growing and distributed membership, I am very excited about a forthcoming announcement”. It has been known that Ratcliff has been working on an updated website platform with the ability for the CIPD to offer virtual branches for some time, enabling geographically dispersed members to attend groups together virtually using state of the art technology.

What this will mean for the profession is not clear. Certainly the three organisations have a wide and diverse membership across the globe and it does provide the opportunity for an international set of standard qualifications in HR, L&D and OD.

This does leave open what the organisation will be called, as there is little overlap in the organisations names, does this also mean the UK organisation will have to drop its valued charted status – or will the riggor of this be retained and offered world wide?

Time will tell how this news is taken. What are your thoughts – good or bad news for members of all organisations? Talk to colleagues and share your thoughts here or on the sites respective forums and community spaces (or their LinkedIn groups)

The SHRM

The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest association devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 250,000 members in over 140 countries, the Society serves the needs of HR professionals and advances the interests of the HR profession. Founded in 1948, SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary offices in China and India.

The ASTD

The American Society for Training & Development (ASTD) is the world’s leading association of workplace learning and performance professionals. Founded in 1944 ASTD’s membership includes more than 70000 people, working in the field of workplace performance in 100 countries worldwide

The CIPD

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) is Europe’s largest HR development professional body. A globally recognised brand with over 135,000 members, who support and develop those responsible for the management and development of people within organisations.


Certificate in L&D Practice (CDP) from the CIPD

January 20, 2010

New qualification – Certificate in L&D Practice (CDP) from the CIPD

Today I was lucky enough to be in a meeting with one of the leading providers of the old CTP , looking at the new CDP programme on offer. The changes to the new qualification are substantial, making the qualification much more relevant to todays business and  L&D needs for the future. 

More hours, deeper content, more ‘lifelike’ assessments, learner centred approach, accelerated learning.. a great package.

CTP to CDP – More than just a name change

While many providers will no-doubt ‘re-badge’ their existing offer, this particular provider has literally started with a clean slate. Everything about the course is new:

  • More realistic assignments
  • More learning time
  • More peer reviews
  • Focus on what L&D do now – not what training functions did 20 years ago
  • Gone has the tutor – in comes the facilitator with a very different remit
  • Gone – pass, merit, distinction – in comes Satisfactory – Not Yet Satisfactory (NYS)
  • Out goes the bias for old theory – in comes practical and tangible application

None of the existing centres have yet had their content verified by the CIPD, although some are due to start 2010 programmes in the coming 6-8 weeks. many have written the material to the new standards and are starting on the premise that approval will be awarded. While this may seem a strange way to work, the approval of qualifications can be a protracted process and commercial organisations need to make money! the risk is with the providers who may need to make adaptations to the content or assessment process “on the fly”. this is not an un-common strategy by both qualification bodies and providers.

As one of the tutors for a provider of the current CTP, and facilitator to be on the new CLP, I can say hand on heart this is a better qualification and participants will gain more from the new format than they will the old one. This is not to say there is anything wrong with the CTP – but it is a little past its sell-by-date, and both the world and the learning and development expectations of our employers has also changed.


CIPD factsheets – an A-to-Z of HR topics & resources

January 9, 2010

CIPD factsheets – essential information for any manager & practitioner

CIPD Annual Conference 2009 - Jackie Orme ©RapidBI 2009An A-to-Z of HR and management related factors is an easy to read and easy to apply style.

The CIPD produce a wonderful set of regularly updated and reviewed factsheets on a wide range of HR and management based topics., While some are available to members only, the majority are available to all.

This pages lists those available as at January 2010. Please note all links open in new windows.

UPDATE MARCH 2011

The CIPD have now put these pages behind a gateway requiring registration. This registration is free.

To go to the CIPD Fact-sheet home page

CIPD Fact-sheet on: 360 feedback
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Absence measurement and management
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Action learning
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Age and employment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Age discrimination: reward policies and procedures MEMBER ONLY
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Aligning learning to the needs of the organisation
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Assessment centres for recruitment and selection
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Basic pay settlements: data sources
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Bonuses and cash incentives
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Business gifts
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Career and outplacement consultants
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Change management
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Coaching
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Company car policies
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Competency and competency frameworks
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Contracts of employment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Corporate social responsibility
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Costing and benchmarking learning and development
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Creative learning methods
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Data protection
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Development planning for individual employees
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Disability and employment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Discipline and grievance procedures: key changes from 6 April 2009 MEMBER ONLY
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Discipline and grievances at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Dismissal
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Diversity: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: E-learning: progress and prospects
CIPD Fact-sheet on: E-recruitment (previously called Online recruitment, and Recruitment on the Internet)
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Emotional intelligence
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee benefits
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee communication
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee engagement
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee relations
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee share ownership
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee turnover and retention
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employee voice
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employer brand
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employer support for learning qualifications
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employing overseas workers
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employing people with criminal records
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employing people with criminal records: risk assessment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employment law developments in 2009 and 2010 (previously Legal developments in…)
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employment law: key differences between Northern Ireland and Great Britain MEMBER ONLY
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Employment tribunals
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Evaluating learning and development
CIPD Fact-sheet on: The environment and people management
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Equal pay
CIPD Fact-sheet on: EU employment policy – formerly called EU social policy
CIPD Fact-sheet on: European Works Councils
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Flexible benefits
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Flexible working
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Harassment and bullying at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Health and safety at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: High performance working
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Hiring consultants
CIPD Fact-sheet on: History of the CIPD
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Homeworking and teleworking
CIPD Fact-sheet on: HR business partnering
CIPD Fact-sheet on: HR outsourcing
CIPD Fact-sheet on: HR policies: which to consider
CIPD Fact-sheet on: HR policies: why and how to introduce them
CIPD Fact-sheet on: HR shared service centres
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Human capital
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Human rights
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Identifying learning and development needs
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Immigration law changes: what employers should know MEMBER ONLY
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Induction
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Interim managers
CIPD Fact-sheet on: International management development: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: International recruitment, selection and assessment: an introduction
CIPD Fact-sheet on: International reward
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Internet and e-mail policies
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Investors in People
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Job evaluation
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Leadership: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Learner-centred courses
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Learning and talent development: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Learning and talent development strategy
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Learning styles
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Local pay: approaches and levels
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Management development
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Managing international assignments
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Market pricing: approaches and considerations
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Maternity, paternity and adoption rights
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Mediation at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Mental health at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Mentoring
CIPD Fact-sheet on: National Minimum Wage
CIPD Fact-sheet on: NLP at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Non cash incentives
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Occupational health
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Occupational pensions
CIPD Fact-sheet on: On-the-job training
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Organisation development
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Outdoor development
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Pay and reward: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Pay progression
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Pay structures
CIPD Fact-sheet on: The people and performance link
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Performance appraisal
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Performance management: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Performance-related pay
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Personnel management: a short history
CIPD Fact-sheet on: PESTLE analysis
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Promoting learning and development in small businesses
CIPD Fact-sheet on: The psychological contract
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Psychological testing
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Quality standards and approaches
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Race, religion and employment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Recruitment: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Recruitment of people working with children and vulnerable adults
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Recruitment outsourcing
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Redundancy
CIPD Fact-sheet on: References
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Relocation
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Retention of personnel records
CIPD Fact-sheet on: The role of front line managers in HR
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Salary review process
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Secondment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Selecting candidates
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Selection interviewing
CIPD Fact-sheet on: The self-employed HR consultant
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Sex discrimination, sexual orientation and gender reassignment and employment
CIPD Fact-sheet on: The skills agenda in the UK
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Smoking at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Strategic human resource management
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Stress at work
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Succession planning
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Swine flu and bird flu (formerly Bird flu)
CIPD Fact-sheet on: SWOT analysis
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Talent management: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Team reward
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Team-working
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Total reward
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Trade unions: a short history
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Training: a short history
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Transfer of undertakings (TUPE)
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Understanding the economy and labour market
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Voluntary benefits
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Whistle-blowing: an overview
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Work-life balance
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Working hours in the UK
CIPD Fact-sheet on: Working time and leave: an overview

Please note the CIPD may remove or update these at any time. In the event of a failure; go to the home page for CIPD Fact-sheets

Feel free to add this page to favorites


What is Performance Management? CIPD Research

December 17, 2009

Performance Management – why do we do it?

The term performance management has been with us for some time, developed out of “appraisals”, Performance Management remains one of the consistently used phrases in the human resources and management field. Recently the CIPD has conducted some research into performance management recently and the responses from 507 people are interesting.

This short article looks at three of the outputs from that research and explores the potential meaning for HR, OD and managers involved in Performance Management.

what-is-performance-mgt

From the graph it can be seen that different organisations appear to have a different meaning.  For some it is about appraisal for others it is about 360s and competence.

Why do Performance Management?

This was one of the questions asked in the survey, and to me there is one main reason – to ensure people have the skills required and deliver the required performance – so you can guess I was very surprised to see the survey results:

CIPD-who-benefits-performance-management

As most seem to be saying that it is intended as a benefit for the individual – why do so many individuals dislike the process?  have you ever spoke to a “typical employee” and they said you you in a happy tone “I have my appraisal today” – it does happen, but it is the exception rather then the norm. Indeed a few minutes on the web and you can find page after page of results listing why staff dislike the process, and that performance management is a good thing for the organisation.

So why the mis-match with this research?

Maybe it is down to understanding. In the survey, professionals were asked what they considered Performance Management to be:

what-does-performance-mgt-mean

With such diverse answers as “regular review meetings”, appraisal, 360 feedback, I can only hope that managers and HR professionals in a given organisation all agreed as to what the process is, and who it is for.

Judging by this research we should stop the process. If it is not adding value to the organisations bottom line through ensuring a sensible level of performance through clear objectives and appropriate skills and knowledge, why do it?

Performance management however you describe it is costly from both a line management point of view and a time perspective. In difficult trading and economic conditions we need to ensure that we all focus on what is important. As this seems to be an area where there is confusion and lack of clarity, then maybe it is time to drop this long standing approach, it was after-all only introduced to cover the non performance of managers managing their people in the first place – so if the managers aren’t managing and the process is not covering the ‘gap’ why bother?

What does Performance Management mean to you, your managers and importantly your people?  Who is it for, and how do you measure the results?

This research can be downloaded from the CIPD site Performance management in Action


CIPD qualifications for Learning & Development (New – CDP)

December 3, 2009

New CIPD qualifications for Learning and Development

Late in 2009 the CIPD have announced some new qualifications that will supersede the CTP, Certificate in Training Practice. There will be two new qualifications for this market – a level 3 and a level 5 programme.

There are not much in the way of details at the time of writing this however the information given below is provided in good faith and as-is.

The announcement of these two programmes is a first for the CIPD, in that for the first time their qualifications are mapped  to the national framework model for professional qualifications. This opens a path for more focussed qualifications linked to the CIPD and the HR/ OD function.

 New Level 3 qualification – certificate in learning & development Practice (CLDP or CDP)

These programme are aimes at practitioners, those involved in the design and delivery of learning solutions

New CIPD Certificate in Learning and Development Practice – CLDP or CDP  (26 credit points)

  

Unit title (table 2)  Credit value  Designation  
Developing yourself as an effective learning and development (L&D) professional   2 Core 
Understanding L&D and the organisational context  Core 
Recording, analysing and using L&D information  Core 
Delivering learning and development activities  Core 
 Table 3 14 credits   
Undertaking a learning needs analysis  Option 
Preparing and designing learning and development activities  Option 
Evaluating learning and development activities  Option 
Developing your coaching skills for the workplace  Option 
Developing your mentoring skills for the workplace  Option 
One or two units from the Certificate in HR Practice (see table 2) (maximum of 6 credits only)  6 or 3  Option 
  12 credits   
Note: 
1. Certificate in L&D Practice (26 credits) Learners will be required to take the core units (total of 14 credit points) and may choose units from the options listed in table 3 (and some from table 2) up to a value of 12 credit points in total. This allows considerable flexibility e.g. 2 x 6 credit units; 4 x 3 credit units; 1 x 6 credit units plus 2 x 3 credit units. Students enrolled on the Certificate in L&D Practice must take units totalling a minimum of 6 credits from the L&D list in table 3.
2. Diploma in L&D Practice (38 credits) Learners seeking a Diploma in L&D Practice will be required to take the same core as the certificate and a minimum of four L&D units from table 3, plus units from table 2 to achieve an overall total of 24 credits for the options. 

Level 5 programme: new CIPD Certificate in Learning and Development Management CLDM or DLDM or Diploma in Human Resource Development (DHRD)

 This programme is at an intermediate level, and suited to managers of Learning & Development functions.

Table 2 ROC for New CIPD Certificate in Learning and Development Management (26 credit points)

Unit title (working titles and subject to change) Credit value Designation
Developing yourself as an effective practitioner 2 Core
Analysing the organisational context and the role of L&D 3 Core
Managing and co-ordinating the L&D function Core
Improving practice in learning and development  Core 
 Table 3 14 credits   
Developing, piloting and evaluating learning and development initiatives  Option 
Facilitating organisational learning and development activities 6 Option
Meeting organisational L&D needs through blended learning 6 Option
Evaluating learning and development within an organisation 3 Option
Working with third party suppliers to deliver organisational learning 3 Option
Developing coaching and mentoring within organisations: 3 Option
One or two units from the Certificate in Managing Human Resources -maximum of 6 credits only 6 credits maximum Option
  12 credits  
Note: 
1. Certificate in HR Development (26 credits) Learners will be required to take the core units (total of 14 credit points) and may choose units from the options listed in table 3 (and some from table 2) up to a value of 12 credit points in total. This allows considerable flexibility e.g. 2 x 6 credit units; 4 x 3 credit units; 1 x 6 credit units plus 2 x 3 credit units. Students enrolled on the Certificate in HRD must take units totalling a minimum of 6 credits from the HRD list in table 3.
2. Diploma in HR Development (38 credits) Learners seeking a Diploma in HRD will be required to take the same core as the certificate and a minimum of four HRD units from table 3, plus units from table 2 to achieve an overall total of 24 credits for the options.

There appears to be some discrepancy in the documentation available as to the title of this course. I hope that they include the term “management” as this will enable providers and purchasers to apply for public funding where available. Table 1 contains the HRM content and is not reproduced here.

As soon as more information is available on these new qualifications from the CIPD I’ll let you know.

The data in the table is (c) the CIPD


Getting ready for CIPD09

November 15, 2009

CIPD09Less than 24 hours to go before I start my journey to CIPD09 in Manchester. 

Basic packing is done – but what tech to take? blog or twitter? text, photo or video?… decisions decisions….

Looking forward to meeting with other colleagues again this year


What is happening in the world of L&D (Training)? Is it changing?

September 22, 2009

Experienced L&D people are bleeding out of organisations and going freelance

training roomWhile talking to a colleague, he confirmed that there appears to be a trend in the training world at the moment. This trend is supported by the change in readership of both my site and blog are getting.

Here is the thought – I’d appreciate your views on this:

Experienced professionals are leaving organisations and going freelance, leaving behind managers and less experienced individuals to carry on delivering.

The evidence:

Times are tough for many organisations and firms are looking to reduce costs. Learning and Development (Training) is seen as a “luxury” so cuts are targeted. People with experience and significant qualifications and competence are seeing the opportunity to take redundancy and “go freelance”.

At networking events there is a distinct increase in the number of “new” coaches and trainers – mainly coaches!

On forums and online networks, there is a trend for a lot of self promotion, and on the whole it looks like people new to the industry, rather than established people “desperate for work”. This activity I have seen on a number of forums and discussion groups I moderate (TrainingZone and LinkedIn)

Types of articles being read. There is certainly (on this site) a trend towards some of the basic articles on “basics of training”, the How to… type of article. The reading numbers for these have gone from 10-12 a day to 30-50, for each article. The numbers here are going through the roof. The extent to which this is L&D professionals looking to information, or people from outside L&D (managers) I do not know – maybe I should add a poll to the site… now there is a thought…

E-Learning

Are those colleagues left behind looking to e-learning as a cost effective way of meeting their organisations needs? certainly, some of our advisers have just undertaken significant contracts providing “Instructional Design” expertise to some of the UKs biggest E-learning providers, as they have a large and growing order book.

Is it that E-learning is more effective? or because it is easier to purchase? E-learning is great for knowledge based acquisition, but not effective (at the low cost end) for behavioural change and improvement. It also requires little skill from the purchaser to have a product, as the role of the “training professional” is to write the basic spec and project manage, not to look at the design itself.

Coaching

Why are so many people leaving industry and setting up as “coaches”? Why are so many people still confused by coaching? Well this latter question is harder to answer – why are new people going freelance and calling themselves “coaches” – simple.. research being published by organisations like the CIPD show that coaching is on the increase, and must be in demand. over the past 2-4 years many people have completed “accredited” and prestigious coaching courses so deem themselves ready for the coaching market.

The CIPD reports says that “90% of organisations now use coaching” which in the context of “Coaching at work” is correct – coaching as a MANAGEMENT STYLE is prolific and has been encouraged. However the growth of the executive or performance coach market (from a purchasers point of view) has not increased at the same rate. Indeed one-to-one coaching seems to be on the cost cutting list. Coaching at work and employing external coaches are not the same thing.

People that call themselves “coaches” but actually deliver “training” are doing themselves and there clients a disservice.

Sustainability

Sustainability needs to be maintained both within the organisation, sustainable standards, skills abilities etc, and in the market place. If too many people pitch for the same work, then often the purchaser will use price as a differentiator. This is not healthy for either side in the long run. A freelance individual must have a sustainable business model, and client organisations must have a sustainable supplier. If you are paying £100 for a current service – what will you do when that provider goes bust – and the going rate is £1000? How long will your budget last? 

Outsourcing

One advantage of outsourcing e-learning is that the activity can be done anywhere in the world. India and other parts of the world have high quality software people, but English and grammar is not as good as many of us require it to be. Outsourcing has its own dangers.

Conclusions

When looking to cut costs – be careful what the “price” is of that activity – better to get added value than a “lower cost”.

While an experienced L&D professional my look expensive on the budget sheet, what is the overall saving they are providing your organisation over a year? The purchase of one wrong. ineffective training intervention can easily outweigh the salary and benefits package of a good performer.


Employee Engagement and Satisfaction Surveys

September 14, 2008

As retention is of increasing importance to our organisations, so is measuring and monitoring the satisfaction and engagement of our people. There are many ways to do this:

  • Go to the big consultancies
  • Design the survey yourself
  • Get a consultancy to design one for you

Each of these have challenges, cost, time, ownership, consistency etc. Now there is a third cost effective solution. The EESS (Employee Engagement and Satisfaction Survey) from RapidBI is a standards based hybrid survey looking at both engagement of your people and their satisfaction, combined with the ability to set your own relevant questions. The EESS is a ready to use on-line solution developed for a range of sectors and organisations, recognising the need for high quality yet cost effective solutions, the EESS has been developed for easy use, quality and useful outputs as well as providing practical solutions.

The EESS has been designed by an experienced CIPD members for credible use by other in-house professionals.

 

As I have been revisiting Employee engagement in recent week I have started to collate a summary of the various approaches… they can be seen at Employee Engagement Models


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.